Health horizons
News and commentary from the Sansom Institute for Health Research
The food issue
Winter/Spring 2011
Commentary
Labelling logic
Sansom Institute Director Professor Kerin O'Dea on how new
recommendations from a recent food labelling review can make it easier
for consumers to make healthier choices.
Research spotlight
Childhood nutrition and omega 3s
How to get kids to eat their greens, and how one Sansom project is using
dietary supplements to improve wellbeing and educational outcomes for
children in remote schools in the Northern Territory.
Five minutes with ...
Associate Professor Jennifer Keogh
Salt, diet and blood vessel function: Health Horizons chats with
dietitian and Sansom Institute researcher, Jennifer Keogh.
Expert tips
Top foods and supplements to improve health and wellbeing
Information abounds on dietary supplements but which ones are
scientifically proven to work? We asked nutritional physiologist
Associate Professor Jon Buckley.
Current research
Food and nutrition-related research underway at the Sansom
Institute
Improving food labelling a logical move
By
Professor Kerin O'Dea AO
Shoppers will have the information they need to make healthy choices and
Australia will lead the world in food labelling standards if the
recommendations of Labelling Logic - the recent review into food
labelling law and policy commissioned by the Australia and New Zealand Food
Regulation Ministerial Council - are put into practice.
Chaired by Dr Neal Blewett AC, the five-member review panel has drawn upon
its collective expertise in public health law, nutrition, food policy,
communications and food marketing, consumer research and health promotion in
this comprehensive and clearly-argued report.
In all there are 61 recommendations - each with a distinct rationale -
covering the areas of public health and food safety, new technologies,
consumer values, design and presentation of the label itself, and the
critical areas of compliance and enforcement. (See below for a list of some
of the key recommendations.)
One of the recommendations that I believe would make a major contribution to
public health is the adoption of a traffic lights front-of-pack labelling
system: green for foods that contribute to a healthy diet, yellow for consume in moderation, and
red for foods that should be eaten only very occasionally. The review
advises that such a system would be voluntary in the first instance, except
where health claims are made. Other sensible suggestions include making
added sugars and fats explicit, and including total and naturally occurring
fibre and trans fatty acids.
I firmly believe that food labelling can help people make healthy choices,
but labels have to be simple to understand and standards should be based on
public health principles, not driven by marketing. As we have seen recently
with the tobacco industry's campaign against plain packaging, any move aimed
at limiting the effects of marketing spin will be vigorously opposed by
those that stand to lose. Accusations of wowserism are a smokescreen:
clearly a new food labelling system will not force people to change what
they eat; what it will do is allow them to make better informed choices if
they want to.
Just one example that highlights the confusing reality for consumers: at the
moment, many people think they are making a healthy choice when they see the
'low fat' or '99% fat free' labels on yoghurt, when many of those products
actually have more calories due to added sugars than do the full fat plain
varieties.
I endorse Labelling Logic wholeheartedly and
urge other health professionals and organisations to do likewise. It is vital that the report be implemented in
its entirety with adequate funding to ensure the critical evaluation of the
reforms' impact on the composition of the food supply and on markers of
population health.
With rates of obesity and preventable, diet-related conditions like type 2
diabetes and Australia's number one killer, cardiovascular disease, at
all-time-highs, we have everything to gain by getting behind Labelling Logic and
nothing - but an unhealthy addiction to fatty and sugary foods - to lose.
The Director of the Sansom Institute for Health Research, Professor
Kerin O'Dea AO is a leading nutrition scientist, public health researcher
and National Health and Medical Research Council member.
Some of the key recommendations in Labelling Logic include:
- Adopting a food labelling issues hierarchy in descending order of food safety, preventive health, new technologies, and consumer values to guide food labelling policy.
- Amending the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 to include a new definition of public health highlighting the importance of the promotion of health and disease prevention as well as health protection;
- Developing a comprehensive food policy that includes a framework for the role of the food panel (label);
- Introducing a multiple traffic lights front-of-pack labelling system (voluntary in the first instance, except where health claims are made);
- Changes to the nutrition information panel, including making added sugars and fats explicit, including total and naturally occurring fibre and trans fatty acids, salt content to be clarified (sodium and potassium identified), and removing the current mandatory 'per serve' column;
- A logical system for health and related claims;
- The ready identification of key additives, colourings and flavourings;
- In relation to alcohol: health risks (particularly for pregnancy), and energy content to be displayed;
- Nutrition information on menus in chain food service outlets and vending machines;
- Foods or ingredients processed by new technologies needing pre-market food safety assessments (such as nanotechnology) to be labelled for 30 years from when they are introduced into the food chain;
- A trans-Tasman food labelling bureau to be established under the FSANZ Act to implement the recommendations in the report;
- The review panel has also designed a system to involve key stakeholders (industry, consumers, public health advocates) in self- and co-regulatory measures.
Download the full report (external link)
Omega 3s and healthy eating habits to boost education and wellbeing
The
benefits of omega 3 fatty acids have been well documented - by more than
14,000 papers, in fact, since a seminal 1970s study first identified how the
Greenland Inuits managed to avoid cardiovascular disease despite a fatty
diet largely consisting of whale and seal meat.
But paradoxically, while evidence abounds of omega 3s' ability to do everything from improve brain function to reduce the risk of stroke, cancer and depression, intake of these wonder fats is on the decline - to the point where a recent NHMRC nutrition survey found that eight out of ten children and adolescents in Australia are consuming virtually no omega 3s, as well as falling far below national guidelines for fruit and veg intake.
One Sansom Institute initiative is working to turn this trend around, by providing hundreds of school kids in the Northern Territory with omega 3 supplements (or placebo) and observing the difference in learning, cognition and behaviour.
Supported by an ARC linkage grant and Vifor Pharma, the project is being led by Dr Natalie Sinn, a Sansom research fellow whose PhD in psychology investigated the effects of micronutrients and omega-3 fatty acids on learning and behaviour in children with ADHD.
Dr Sinn says that while omega 3 intake has declined all over Australia,
the trend is more pronounced in remote Indigenous populations. "There are so
many obstacles in remote areas, a big one being that most of the foods that
contain omega 3s - like seafood, leafy green veggies, nuts and seeds - are
either not available or affordable," she says.
While the use of supplements can overcome some of these barriers, Dr Sinn says more education is required to ensure sustainability beyond the period of the study - which is why the project is school-based. "As well as showing parents how important omega 3s are for children's learning and behaviour, we want to extend this to a whole range of nutrients and gain evidence to support programs to make healthy food more accessible."
And while supplements are a convenient way to up omega 3 intake, Dr Sinn
says limiting unhealthy fats - such as the omega 6s found in processed foods
- is an equally important measure that warrants further attention. "In
traditional diets there was a one to one ratio of omega 3 and omega 6
intake, now it's more like one to twenty," she says. "We need to be doing
more to reduce the amount of processed foods we're eating."
Dr Sinn applauds mass-media education campaigns like the 5-veg 2-fruit
initiative, but says such messages are being undermined by marketers'
attempts to make processed, branded foods appear healthier. "While
advertising has a lot to answer for, there's still a lot parents can do to
counter such messages and ensure their children are eating well."
But what are parents to do when faced with the combined forces of fussy
eaters, misleading ads and pester power?
Dr Sinn has the following advice for parents struggling to convince their
kids to eat their greens:
- Create a positive environment around food for children. "Role model
healthy behaviours and involve them in gardening and cooking."
- Give them healthy food options. "Don't have junk food in the house and you
won't be tempted to use it as a bribe."
- Don't offer them bread for dinner if they won't eat their veggies or try
to tempt them with the promise of a sugary desert. "Research shows children
will prefer the desert meal, so continually offering it as a bribe only
undermines attempts to get them to enjoy vegetables."
- If at first you don't succeed, try and try again. "Studies show that
children who are regularly exposed to healthy foods will start to eat them
in time if you keep offering them."
Five minutes with... Jennifer Keogh
A
qualified dietitian with more than 35 years' experience in Australia and the
UK, Associate Professor Jennifer Keogh is an expert on diet in relation to
obesity and heart disease, and in particular the effects of high salt diets.
You're currently leading an NHMRC-funded project examining salt
intake and blood vessel function. How did the project come about and what do
you hope the research will achieve?
This latest project follows on from a previous study I supervised that found
if you reduce salt in the diet you improve blood flow and blood vessel
function, and improve it in a way that's more complex than simply lowering
high blood pressure. It took three attempts before we won the grant so it
goes to show that persistence pays!
We're now going to assess the effects of salt in the diet on blood vessel
function over a longer period of time. We want to understand the mechanisms
behind how the salt affects endothelial function and use that knowledge to
a) empower people to take notice of their salt intake to improve their
health and reduce the risk of diabetes and heart disease, and b) inform the
public policy debate to bring about salt reduction.
As one of the dietitians who contributed to the hugely successful
CSIRO Total Wellbeing Diet (and its subsequent three follow-ups, including
the latest,
Diabetes Diet and Lifestyle Plan) it must be gratifying to see your work
reach such a wide and appreciative audience. Why do you think it was so
successful?
I was working as a research dietitian at the CSIRO at the time the book was
written. It was a wonderful opportunity to be involved in translating
research into a format that people can use in their everyday lives. It's why
we do research isn't it? - to benefit the health of the nation. The first
book sold over a million copies and consumer research has indicated that
around 500,000 people lost weight on the diet, losing an average six
kilograms each. I think part of the reason for its success was that it had a
positive message, letting people know that they have power to improve their
health, and giving them the knowledge and motivation to make changes.
Most people are generally aware that diets that are high in salt
diets are not conducive to good health, but what practical measures can
individuals take to minimise their risk of disease and optimise health?
The NHMRC recommends that we don’t have more than six grams of salt each
day, but it's a target that's really hard to achieve in reality. People
think they are doing well by not adding salt to their cooking, without
realising that 70-85 per cent of the salt that we eat is in manufactured
food - and it's not just in chips and salted nuts but things like bread,
biscuits, cheese and processed meats.
It's important to eat fresh food as much as possible because food like fruit
and vegetables, eggs, and fresh meat and fish are naturally very low in
sodium. When you're in the supermarket you can look for products that are
labelled 'salt reduced' or 'low salt', as well as checking out the
nutritional information panel on the back. If a food contains 120 mgs of
sodium or less it's allowed to call itself low salt according to FSANZ (Food
Standards Australia and New Zealand). However a lot of brands don't trumpet
their low salt status as it can turn consumers off, so it's definitely worth
reading the fine print. It's also worth looking for foods with more
potassium in them as potassium reduces the negative effects of sodium.
Do you think greater regulation of foods that are high in salt is
required? Why?
I think we need clearer labelling that helps people to make informed
choices about the food they eat. Most people don't have the time to read the
nutritional information on the back and for older people it's so small you'd
have to bring a magnifying glass to the supermarket. The Heart Foundation
tick is a good initiative but it's not universal and only appears on
products that have opted in. I'd like to see traffic lights on the front of
packaging with green for healthy foods, amber for those that should be
consumed in moderation and red for those that are high in salt and saturated
fats.
Top foods and supplements to improve health
With
hundreds - if not thousands - of vitamins and nutritional supplements on the
market purporting to help with everything from weight loss to digestion and
brain function, consumers can find it difficult to choose the right
supplement - let alone gain optimal nutrition from diet alone. Sansom
Institute member and leader of the Nutritional Physiology Research Centre,
Associate Professor Jon Buckley, has overseen numerous studies examining the
effects of bioactive components found in food, and says there are several
that stand out from the pack with scientifically-proven health benefits that
extend beyond basic nutrition. His top tips are:
Omega 3s
Literally thousands of studies have shown that long chain omega 3 fatty
acids have a wide range of benefits, with considerable evidence of
improvements in cardiovascular health, and growing evidence of benefits for
aiding weight loss and reducing obesity and improving cognitive function.
Some of the best sources include oily fish such as salmon, mackerel and
sardines, and of course supplements.
Cocoa
The flavonoids in cocoa have been shown to help reduce blood pressure and
improve cardiovascular health, with improved learning and memory and lowered
LDL cholesterol other likely benefits. But before you go reaching for that
block of chocolate, note that such benefits have only been achieved via the
consumption of pure cocoa or cocoa powder - and to a lesser extent, dark
chocolate - as the sugar, fats and cooking processes associated with most
chocolate is thought to counter any health-boosting properties.
Resveratrol
It may be a comparatively new kid on the supplement scene, but
Buckley says there is good evidence showing that resveratrol can help
maintain healthy artery function and improve cardiovascular health. There
have also been animal studies pointing to potential anti-cancer and
anti-ageing properties. Resveratrol is found in the skins of red grapes and
in red wine (but only in small quantities), and to a lesser extent in
mulberries and blueberries, making supplements the ideal way to gain maximum
health benefit.
One to watch: Vitamin D
About half of the Australian population have sub-optimal levels of vitamin
D, a concerning trend that Buckley says brings with it a wide range of
health implications including poorer musculoskeletal and cardiovascular
health, and increased mortality. Exposure to sunlight, fatty fish, dairy
foods, cod liver oil and vitamin supplements are all sources of Vitamin D.
Current food and nutrition-related research
These are just some of the food and nutrition-related projects underway at the Sansom Institute:
- Effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on learning and behaviour of children in predominantly Indigenous Northern Territory schools (see Research Spotlight above)
- Can bone-derived vitamin D regulate bone cell activity?
- Sustained effects of resveratrol on circulatory function in obese adults
- Efficacy of lutein-milk for improving exercise self-efficacy and exercise participation in older adults (more info)
- Effects of modification of dietary salt intake on endothelial function in obese subjects (more info)
- Early life nutrition (ages 0-5) and physiological risk, adiposity and neurocognitive development in later childhood and adolescence
- Nutrition practices in SA Child Care Centres: comparison with state and national guidelines
- Development of the first validated index to describe the diet quality
of Australian children and adolescents
- Effects of changing from regular-fat to low-fat dairy foods on children's total diet and metabolic health
- Evaluation of peanuts as a source of bioactive nutrients for enhancement of
endothelial function and cognitive performance
